本作由《第九区》导演尼尔·布洛姆坎普旗下的Oats Studios制作。3段各约20分钟的短片组成的《第一卷》，打响了Oats计划中实验短片系列第一枪。但导演表示是否会有第二卷、第三卷取决于观众的态度。《第一卷》即将登陆YouTube和Steam平台。
2. Hermit and Display of Intent
这里面有传奇的生涯，有令人眼花缭乱的商战，有浓烈奇特的真情。更有一个不断追求奋斗的高贵灵魂。
再说李敬文，本来是要帮葫芦他们的，可是参与打架的有不少是李家子弟，其中就有他三叔李长星的儿子李敬德，于是也跟泥鳅一样，踌躇起来。
如今到了决一死战的时候，山那边怕也分出胜负来了，自然该‘狭路相逢勇者胜了。
你算个屁。
霍华德·桑特开始肝颤了，他深知弗兰克的家底儿：他受过海豹突击队、水下破坏组、远范围侦察等等训练,精
儿女们长大了，老人苏世坤和相依相伴的老伴范淑贞历尽沧桑，在不尽的风雨中变老了。 作为力学研究院高级顾问的苏世坤，虽已年近七旬，却一天到晚忙忙活活。为这事，老伴和孩子们不止一次劝他“累了一辈子了，也该歇歇，享几年清福了！”但苏世坤却不这么认为，总是说，“人越老越不能闲着，不干事，人就闲坏了，越老越得有点事干，有事干了，才充实……，他还说，人老了，就像一台老机器一样，如果它每天都在运转，就不会报废，如果让它闲置在一边，不再运转了，恐怕用不了几个月，这台机器就会像一堆锈迹斑斑的废铁疙瘩，再也转不起来了……”。 眼下，五个儿女都已经长大了，陆陆续续成家立业，按理说，两个老人已经基本完成任务，该过几天安稳日子了，可说不清怎么回事，总是摁下葫芦，瓢起来，这些个儿女们几乎没有一天让老人省过心。 儿女们当中，可以说二女儿苏文静是最让两个老人操心的一个闺女了。 苏文静这闺女从小又机灵又皮实，可就是学习跟不上趟，几乎年年补考。就是这么一个孩子，却能从初一就和一个叫赵树彬的男同学开始谈恋爱，一
工作前景黯淡,家庭责任繁重,感情生活又多舛,这名街头舞者实在是蜡烛三头烧,但她发觉自己或许可以凭藉着舞艺,脱离这个德尔班劳工阶级小镇。
《南方女王》讲述关于女主Teresa Mendoza的故事，当他的毒贩男盆友在墨西哥意外被谋杀后，女主被迫逃到美国寻求庇护，她与过去的小伙伴一起共同反击杀害他男友并追杀她的贩毒集团头目，然而在这过程中，慢慢的她学会了贩毒行当的“知识”和“谋略”，并渐渐的成为贩毒集团新的老大。
我又不是郑家儿子，少几成是应该的。
一之濑步（中岛裕翔 饰）从小就将成为杰出职业围棋手作为毕生的理想，无奈高中时代家中突遭变故，父亲去世，生活的全部重担落到了母亲（朝加真由美 饰）孱弱的肩上。坚强的母亲全力的支持着步实现他的理想，步亦凭借着努力和智慧在成为职业棋手的道路上艰难前行，可是最终，已经23岁的步还是失去了成为职业选手的最后机会。
另一方面，徽王府采取互督政策，鼓励互相检举，若有逃过徽王府走私者，检举者有赏，别人都抽成唯有你走私，其实离死也不远了。
天楚国本该姓楚，一场宫闱巨变致使帝后遇难，国家陷入风雨飘摇，国师风如歌当机立断独掌朝纲，十五年来，日渐成年的太子有心夺回失去的一切，奈何天楚已是风党天下……
Telecommunications
1. As a math student, I have studied math for four years, and I don't agree with the bibliography you gave at random. First, there is no step type and it is unfriendly to beginners. Your title and the purpose of writing this series are probably for Xiaobai to see. So, may I ask, a Xiaobai needs to see the principle of mathematical analysis? ? Is it necessary to look at Princeton Calculus Principle to learn artificial intelligence? ? In my shallow understanding, the biggest difference between mathematical analysis and advanced mathematics is the same theorem. High numbers only require that they can be used. Mathematical analysis is rigorous and will definitely give proof. However, for the mathematics needed in most artificial intelligence, you need to prove the correctness and completeness of this theorem in your work? ? I'm afraid the project will be closed long ago when you prove it. You replied to me that this is only a bibliography, not a recommended bibliography, but most of the following comments decided to give up when they saw the book list. If you put these books out, it will be instructive to those who read your articles. I think you are misleading people. Second, I have roughly deduced from the number of references you have made that you may not have a framework for the mathematics of the whole artificial intelligence, otherwise there would not have been such irresponsible recommendations. However, out of respect for you, I did not question your ability. I only gave a brief recommendation in the comments on the suitable math bibliography for beginners.
